<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>CuppaDev - Latest Comments in Double Entry Accounting in Rails</title><link>http://cuppadev.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://cuppadev.disqus.com/double_entry_accounting_in_rails/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 11:48:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Double Entry Accounting in Rails</title><link>http://www.cuppadev.co.uk/double-entry-accounting-in-rails#comment-141959303</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am noob ! it will be great if you would explain database model in a simplified, exemplified language with diagrams :) PLEASE ! It will be a great help !&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">webiyo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 11:48:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Entry Accounting in Rails</title><link>http://www.cuppadev.co.uk/double-entry-accounting-in-rails#comment-3785584</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the approach i liked the best was the one mentioned in the article. It made the most sense, and wasn’t needlessly complicated. So i decided to implement it&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Artificial</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:25:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Entry Accounting in Rails</title><link>http://www.cuppadev.co.uk/double-entry-accounting-in-rails#comment-3134416</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Haha&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Actually, that wouldn't be such a bad idea... :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Urquhart</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:32:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Entry Accounting in Rails</title><link>http://www.cuppadev.co.uk/double-entry-accounting-in-rails#comment-3134370</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm rather looking forward to the post "Double Entry Accounting with Invoicing in Rails."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steveluscher</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:28:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Entry Accounting in Rails</title><link>http://www.cuppadev.co.uk/double-entry-accounting-in-rails#comment-2429689</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks kronidas.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When i writ that code, i hadn't quite figured out the difference between new and create. safe to say, now i know. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Urquhart</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:01:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Entry Accounting in Rails</title><link>http://www.cuppadev.co.uk/double-entry-accounting-in-rails#comment-2429692</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Repost.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;br&gt;type less. :)&lt;br&gt;#third_transaction = &lt;a href="http://Journal.new" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Journal.new"&gt;Journal.new&lt;/a&gt;(:transaction_type =&amp;gt; :transfer, :start_date =&amp;gt; &lt;a href="http://Time.now" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Time.now"&gt;Time.now&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;#&lt;a href="http://third_transaction.save" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="third_transaction.save"&gt;third_transaction.save&lt;/a&gt;!&lt;br&gt;third_transaction = third_transaction.create(:transaction_type =&amp;gt; :transfer, :start_date =&amp;gt; &lt;a href="http://Time.now" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Time.now"&gt;Time.now&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kronidas&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kronidas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:14:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Entry Accounting in Rails</title><link>http://www.cuppadev.co.uk/double-entry-accounting-in-rails#comment-2429691</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;br&gt;type less. :)&lt;br&gt;#third_transaction = &lt;a href="http://Journal.new" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Journal.new"&gt;Journal.new&lt;/a&gt;(:transaction_type =&amp;gt; :transfer, :start_date =&amp;gt; &lt;a href="http://Time.now" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Time.now"&gt;Time.now&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;#&lt;a href="http://third_transaction.save" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="third_transaction.save"&gt;third_transaction.save&lt;/a&gt;!&lt;br&gt;third_transaction.create(:transaction_type =&amp;gt; :transfer, :start_date =&amp;gt; &lt;a href="http://Time.now" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Time.now"&gt;Time.now&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kronidas&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kronidas</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:13:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Entry Accounting in Rails</title><link>http://www.cuppadev.co.uk/double-entry-accounting-in-rails#comment-2429677</link><description>&lt;p&gt;John,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A Journal binds together several Posting's. Typically you'd have one per full account transaction - e.g. DEBIT Bank 100, CREDIT Revenue 100 could be linked to a single journal of the type "Deposit". In theory it makes it easy to track complex transactions which consist of transfers to/from multiple accounts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The linked article does indeed make Journals a bit confusing by referring to them by letters (a,b,c,d). Instead you should just refer to them by key number (1,2,3,4) and the whole thing becomes much more clearer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My above example could be recorded in the POSTINGS table as follows (assuming Bank == 100 and Revenue == 50):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Id,Account Id,Journal Id,Asset Type,Amount&lt;br&gt;1,100,1,£,100&lt;br&gt;2,50,1,£,-100&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;100 + -100 == 0, thus satisfying the requirements in the article.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hope that helps. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Urquhart</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:14:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Entry Accounting in Rails</title><link>http://www.cuppadev.co.uk/double-entry-accounting-in-rails#comment-2429676</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What I don't understand is the journal table.  It looks like a simple lookup table.  Why is so much ephasis placed on it in the article you reference (first one.)  It says:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I.e. all POSTING entries associated with the JOURNAL entry must be successfully completed or none must be completed. The numerical sum of all POSTING entries associated with a JOURNAL entry must also equal zero&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What's that mean?  If you look at the example table entries is just has a, b, c, d for the type.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the article.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:03:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>